Ride-UK   The National Bridleroute Network
Introduction | Rationale | Extent | Information | News | Opportunities | Index
Route Identification | Surfacing Standards | Furnture Standards

Signage Plan

The aim of signing the National Bridleroute Network is to enable routes to be followed by people unfamiliar with the area through which they run. This is facilitated by a common signing standard which is easy to recognise, intuitive to understand, and simple to implement. This information sheet describes the signage system proposed for adoption to meet these objectives. Direction signs will be needed at junctions between roads, and between roads and paths. Signs along on-road sections of the route serve as direction indicators and as a reminder to motorists that horses can be expected. Waymark arrows are used at junctions between off-road paths.


What does the system cover?
This standard covers two classes of sign:
  • Those where bridleways, restricted byways and byways open to all traffic leave the metalled road, and
  • Those that will appear along on-road stretches.
The first set ('the green signs') are those required by s.27 Countryside Act 1968. No regulations have been made prescribing the design of these signs, although the statute says that they should include information about the path's destination and distance where considered convenient and appropriate by the highway authority. For long distance paths, it is considered desirable to have a close location for the benefit of local users, and a further away destination, to assist those using the path as part of a longer journey. Permission to use these signs should be obtained from the highway authority for the area (the county council or unitary authority).

The second set of signs ('the blue signs') are regulated by the DETR. At present each sign used needs to be authorised by the DETR as a departure from the standard sign regulations [1]. The British Horse Society is seeking the adoption of the signage presented in this information sheet as part of the standard signs, so that individual departure applications will not be necessary.

Why do we need a common system?
The adoption of similar systems around the region makes it easier for path users to identify and follow long distance paths. It also enables new routes to be added to the network in the future without the need to reinvent signage. The costs for signing a route are reduced by using standard forms. For road signs, it will be possible to get DETR approval for the type of sign rather than having to seek individual approval for each individual sign. This means that signing the routes can be performed more cheaply, so leaving more money for path creation.

Green signs - What do they look like?
The figure shows the first sign put up for the London Orbital Bridleroute ('H25'). There are three lines of text. The first shows that the route is a public bridleway and that it is numbered '21' within its parish. The status and number are correct at the point where the sign is placed. The colour of the chevron (blue in the figure) should be in agreement with the status (blue for bridleway, red for byway). The second and third lines show destinations that can be reached by following the path. The second line shows a fairly close destination while the third line shows a key destination along the long distance route as a whole. The numbers after the destinations are the distances to the destination in miles and fractions of a mile. The use of fractions rather than decimals is in order to remain in keeping with other highway signs. Miles are used in preference to kilometers because other distances on highway signs (as on roads or the National Cycle Network, for example) are also in miles. It would be confusing to route users if some signs were in one system and some in another. The white 'H25' text in a red box represents the National Route number.

While it is not mandatory to use signs of this nature, consistent signing is seen to be an aid to the path user. Some highway authorities prefer to use wooden signs for bridleways and byways; this standard does not prevent that practice continuing, but those authorities will need to consider how to draw the attention of route followers to the path.

Blue signs - What do they look like?
The set of route markers for use along on-road sections has been modelled on the existing DETR set of signs for cycle routes and those giving indications about ridden horses. The examples here represent signs used to confirm that the rider is on the correct route and to indicate where the route turns left. The British Horse Society is seeking their adoption by DETR within the standard set of authorised signs.

Where did the route number come from?
The route numbers for the National Bridleroute Network are depicted by white text in a red box. Ideally, the route numbers should indicate roughly where the paths go in an intuitive way. The London Orbital Bridleroute is the H25 because the number M25 was used for the London Orbital Motorway. The Great Northern Bridleway is the H1; it runs generally north from London and is the equestrian equivalent of the A1. For similar reasons, the Ridgeway can be considered to be the H4, and the North Downs Way the H2. For community circuits and local and linear routes, a blue patch instead of a red patch should be used. An information sheet is available [2] that explains how the numbering system works.

Why are the numbers white on red (or white on blue)?
This has been chosen to be the same as the system for the National Cycling Network. The only difference is that the equestrian routes are prefixed with an 'H' (for Horse). The adoption of a similar system has the following benefits.

  • Cyclists can legally use the equestrian routes, so it is sensible to use a system they will recognise. The prefix H indicates that they cannot expect the same type of surfacing as they would expect on the National Cycle Network.
  • Where signs appear along the road, motorists will get used to one system of signage meaning that they should slow down and take extra care as they are on or are crossing important strategic routes for the non-motorised. A multiplicity of systems would be less recognisable to motorists and would not provide the same level of safety improvement.
  • It will be easier for the DETR to approve a system that is in many respects the same as one they have already approved. This will speed the adoption of the signage standard by highway authorities.

    Is there general advice on signing?
    The aim of the signs that have been described is to enable those following a National Route to identify where to go, especially at junctions where more than one route could be followed. The use of double-sided signs at junctions also allows riders not on the National Route that they can join it.

    The use of destinations and distances on signs is encouraged. These enable riders to monitor their pace, see how far it is to their next stop. On National Routes, key points should be identified approximately 5 miles apart. For signs where paths leave the metalled road, it is usual to have two destinations: one near by (perhaps where that path leads to) and one further away (usually a key point on the route).

    The size of the sign chosen should fit in with its planned location. Where two National Routes cross or run along the same route for a short distance, it will be necessary to show both route number patches on the signs, and this may need the size to be varied from normal. The size of a sign is determined by the height of a lower case letter 'x' (called the 'x-height'). [3] SUSTRANS advise that for the National Cycling Network, an x-height of 35mm is suitable for on-road locations for simple signs, but that this can be reduced when the signs carry additional information [4].

    What about off road route markers?
    The use of waymark arrows along paths is encouraged. These should be at any junction with other paths so that those following the regional route do not go astray. The Countryside Agency promoted colours (blue for bridleway, red for byway) are recommended since these reinforce the idea that horses should not be on yellow-arrowed paths (footpaths). The colouring is given statutory effect by the 2002 edition of the sign regulations [1]. For strategic routes, the route number (for example, H1) should be added to any text on the arrow, but otherwise there are no requirements concerning the wording used. The figure shows the waymarks being put up by the British Horse Society on the London Orbital Bridleroute.

    References
    1. Traffic Signs Regulations and General Directions 2002. HMSO SI 2002/3113.
    2. Numbering the National Bridleroute Network. BHS, 2000.
    3. Traffic Signs Manual, Chapter 7 'The Design of Traffic Signs'. DETR, DOE (NI), Scottish Office and Welsh Office, 1997.
    4. Direction Signing on the National Cycle Network. SUSTRANS information sheet FF26, June 1999.


    © 2000 The British Horse Society Revised: 30 May 05.